Applied AI systems
How to turn models, data, tools, and human oversight into operational capabilities that can be evaluated.
Applied research and evidence
Real questions, reviewable methods, and outcomes with visible limits.
A public applied-research agenda, reproducibility criteria, and connected technical profiles without invented publications or outcomes.
Public agenda
Research to improve a decision, not to decorate a profile.
My research work focuses on applied problems where architecture, evaluation, governance, and product must hold together. This page presents the agenda and standard; it does not turn internal materials, tests, or open profiles into publications.
Research directions
Four questions connected by one evidence discipline.
Agent evaluation
How to measure usefulness, boundaries, authority, traceability, and adversarial behavior before expanding autonomy.
Reproducible knowledge
How to preserve sources, versions, decisions, and sufficient conditions to repeat or falsify an outcome.
Product and evidence
How to connect a technical question to a product decision without turning a demonstration into commercial impact.
Evidence method
From a question to an artifact that can be reviewed.
- 1
Question
Define what needs to be learned, for whom, and which observation could change the decision.
- 2
Protocol
Fix data, environment, comparison, metrics, risks, and invalidation conditions before seeing the outcome.
- 3
Artifact
Version allowed code, data, configuration, output, and enough lineage for inspection.
- 4
Evaluation
Separate local tests, repetitions, boundaries, and measured outcomes without generalizing beyond the evidence.
- 5
Publication
Publish only after reviewing identity, rights, sensitivity, reproducibility, and claim language.
Connected record
Identity, reproducible materials, and technical work remain separate.
These public profiles serve different purposes. Their existence confirms an observed surface, not an approved work, dataset, notebook, or outcome.
ORCID
Persistent identifier for connecting verifiable works when they exist.
Open ORCID ↗OSF
Space for reproducible materials that pass rights and scope review.
Open OSF ↗Kaggle
Technical profile for real notebooks or datasets under clean-room and rights review.
Open Kaggle ↗Authorized verified publications: 0
The record will contain only real, versioned, reproducible, and approved artifacts. No placeholder content is used.
Publication standard
Four conditions before making an outcome claim.
- Source and lineage
- The claim points to identifiable sources and versions.
- Reproducible method
- Another person can understand what ran and under which conditions.
- Rights and privacy
- Code, data, images, and text have publication-compatible authorization.
- Scope and limitations
- The outcome states what it shows, what it does not show, and when it must be reviewed.